LostKnightsRPG.org

Thats right, two kids with way too much magic.

Harry gets his broom, a golden snitch, his wand, and a text book on magic, so he can actually cast some spells (What, he never studied anything but fighting the bad guys).
Peter gets his sword and Tinker Bell, lets face it no matter how hard you try to keep her away she's always gonna find a away to get to Peter. One could argue that Harry has friends who can help him out, but lets face it Ron is a nit wit, and Hermione can be distracted with a nice set of abs.

The setting is a Quiditch field which has been broadsided by a flying pirate ship.

The contest is to see if Harry can catch his snitch, before Pete and Tink gut him like a fish for trying to grow up so fast.

ok, here's why peter pan wins:

J.M. Barrie, the author of the original novel and play, is an actual part of literature, who can write a compelling tale and imagine a vivid setting that is consistent, and avoids ret-cons and has both talent and ability. J.K. Rowlings is a total hack, and up against a real author has no chance to win whatsoever. So their respective characters, reflecting the ability of the authors, are unevenly matched, even on a quidditch field. Really the only chance to defeat pan is to defeat tink, which harry could only manage by disbelieving in faeries, which he intrinsically cannot do because he DOES believe in faeries. Also, all that harry would manage to do is fly in circles and grit his teeth. Pan would grab the snitch himself in no time flat, and harry would realize that he's been chasing tinkerbell all afternoon. Then pan would break harry's glasses, knock him off his broom, and ditch him in mermaid infested waters with a vicious leg wound, and then fly home, feed the snitch to the alligator that swallowed a clock, rough up the lost boys for fun, and blow his load in wendy's face.

Harry may have survived voldemort's stinging foam attack or whatever, but he's no match for a real character.

I cry tears of joy and unsurpased happiness at you.

Rusty wrote:ok, here's why peter pan wins:

J.M. Barrie, the author of the original novel and play, is an actual part of literature, who can write a compelling tale and imagine a vivid setting that is consistent, and avoids ret-cons and has both talent and ability. J.K. Rowlings is a total hack, and up against a real author has no chance to win whatsoever. So their respective characters, reflecting the ability of the authors, are unevenly matched, even on a quidditch field. Really the only chance to defeat pan is to defeat tink, which harry could only manage by disbelieving in faeries, which he intrinsically cannot do because he DOES believe in faeries. Also, all that harry would manage to do is fly in circles and grit his teeth. Pan would grab the snitch himself in no time flat, and harry would realize that he's been chasing tinkerbell all afternoon. Then pan would break harry's glasses, knock him off his broom, and ditch him in mermaid infested waters with a vicious leg wound, and then fly home, feed the snitch to the alligator that swallowed a clock, rough up the lost boys for fun, and blow his load in wendy's face.

Harry may have survived voldemort's stinging foam attack or whatever, but he's no match for a real character.

amen.

oh, and when it comes down to it, peter is a better flyer that doesn't need a broom. his aerobatics are legendary. and since all spells in the shit-verse (short for potter-verse), well, peter does in fact gut him. but i think he'd take hermione with him. foursome's are fun, especially when they are with a fairy, a witch, and some random other girl that no one gives a shit about but calls mommy (wendy is weird...)